|
Developed by
|
Supported by
|
|

GS-3242 and LEN
NATAP and wikipedia
Aqueous drug particle suspension, Oral solid form
Oral, Subcutaneous, Route of administration is being determined in the clinical program
To be determined
to be determined
to be determined
to be determined
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
NCT07645287
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07645287
Phase II
Recruiting
Gilead Sciences
The study will have two parts: Part A and Part B. In Part A, the goal of the study is to compare the effectiveness of switching to the study drugs GS-3242 plus Lenacapavir (LEN) versus continuing Biktarvy (bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF)), in virologically suppressed people with HIV-1 (PWH) in treatment Group 1, 2 and 3 at Week 35. In Part B the goal of the study is to compare the effectiveness of switching to the study drugs, GS-3242 and LEN versus continuing B/F/TAF in Groups 4 and 3 at Week 26. The primary objective of part A is to evaluate the efficacy of switching to intramuscular (IM) GS-3242 plus IM LEN versus continuing on B/F/TAF PWH who are virologically suppressed in treatment Groups 1, 2, and 3 at Week 35 and Part B is to evaluate the efficacy of swit
A Study of GS-3242 in Combination With Lenacapavir Versus Biktarvy in Virologically Suppressed People With HIV-1
Intervention 1
Intervention 2
Intervention 3
Intervention 4
Intervention 5
Not provided
Anticipated Start Date
Not provided
Actual Start Date
2026-06-15
Anticipated Date of Last Follow-up
2026-08-04
Estimated Primary Completion Date
2027-08-01
Estimated Completion Date
2033-04-01
Actual Primary Completion Date
Not provided
Actual Completion Date
Not provided
Age Cohort
Genders
Accepts pregnant individuals
Unspecified
Accepts lactating individuals
Unspecified
Accepts healthy individuals
No
Key Inclusion Criteria: * Documented human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) \< 50 copies/mL for ≥ 6 months before screening. * Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels \< 50 copies/mL at screening. * Receiving bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (coformulated; Biktarvy®) (B/F/TAF) for ≥ 6 months prior to screening. * No documented resistance to GS-3242 (integrase mutation Q148H/K/R plus at least 2 of the following integrase mutations: L74I/M, T97A, E138A/K/T, or G140A/C/S). Key Exclusion Criteria: * Prior use of, or exposure to GS-3242 or LEN. * History of virologic failure while on an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimen. * Prior use of any long-acting parenteral antiretroviral therapy (ART) medications such as monoclonal antibodies or broadl
Not provided
Interventional (clinical trial)
175
Randomized
Parallel Assignment
Not provided
Open label
Not provided
Treatment
| Type | Title | Content | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Link | Protocol design and endpoint interpretation | https://synapse.patsnap.com/blog/clinical-landscape-nct07645287-gs-3242-trial-report-2026-mcp |
NCT07708727
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07708727
Phase II/III
Not yet recruiting
Gilead Sciences
The study will have two portions: Phase 2 and Phase 3. Phase 2 will further have 2 parts: Part A and Part B. The goal of Phase 2, Part A is to assess the effectiveness of study drugs GS-3242 plus Lenacapavir (LEN) versus Biktarvy (bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF)), in people with HIV-1 (PWH) who are new to treatment. This will be done in Treatment Groups 1, 2 and 3 at Week 35. The goal of Phase 2, Part B is to compare the effectiveness of study drugs, GS-3242 and LEN versus B/F/TAF in Groups 4 and 3 at Week 26. The goal of Phase 3 is to assess the long-term effectiveness of study drug GS-3242 and LEN versus B/F/TAF, at Week 52. The primary objectives of this study are: Phase 2, Part A: To evaluate the efficacy of intramuscular (IM) GS-3242 plus IM LEN versus B
Study of an Injectable Regimen of GS-3242 With Lenacapavir Compared to Biktarvy in People New to HIV-1 Treatment
Intervention 1
Intervention 2
Intervention 3
Intervention 4
Intervention 5
Not provided
Not provided
Anticipated Start Date
2026-07-01
Actual Start Date
Not provided
Anticipated Date of Last Follow-up
2026-07-13
Estimated Primary Completion Date
2030-10-01
Estimated Completion Date
2033-04-01
Actual Primary Completion Date
Not provided
Actual Completion Date
Not provided
Age Cohort
Genders
Accepts pregnant individuals
Unspecified
Accepts lactating individuals
Unspecified
Accepts healthy individuals
No
Key Inclusion Criteria: * HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) ≥ 500 copies/mL at screening. * Antiretroviral (ARV) treatment-naive, except for prior use of oral daily pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) up to 1 month prior to screening. Key Exclusion Criteria: * Prior usage of, or exposure to LEN or GS-3242 * Prior use of any long-acting parenteral ARV therapy (ART) medications such as monoclonal antibodies or broadly neutralizing antibodies targeting HIV-1, injectable cabotegravir (including oral cabotegravir lead-in), or injectable rilpivirine. Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Not provided
Interventional (clinical trial)
700
Randomized
Parallel Assignment
Not provided
Open label
Not provided
Treatment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
There are either no relevant patents or these were not yet submitted to LAPaL
There are no publication
No documents were uploaded
|
|
Collaborate for developmentConsider on a case by case basis, collaborating on developing long acting products with potential significant public health impact, especially for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), utilising the referred to long-acting technology Not provided |
|
|
Share technical information for match-making assessmentProvide necessary technical information to a potential partner, under confidentiality agreement, to enable preliminary assessment of whether specific medicines of public health importance in LMICs might be compatible with the referred to long-acting technology to achieve a public health benefit Not provided |
|
|
Work with MPP to expand access in LMICsIn the event that a product using the referred to long-acting technology is successfully developed, the technology IP holder(s) will work with the Medicines Patent Pool towards putting in place the most appropriate strategy for timely and affordable access in low and middle-income countries, including through licensing Not provided |
Not provided